

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Rayan Cherki has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 39.6% for Bruno Fernandes and 27.9% for Rayan Cherki, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.
|
Priced at £5.8m and £6.5m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Semi Ajayi and 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.
|
Priced at £7.9m and £7.7m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 3 against Morgan Rogers at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 21.3% and 40.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 6.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 6.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 26.2% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.6 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.
|


Priced at £6.0m and £9.1m, there is a £3.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.7 against Alexander Isak at 3.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 25.5% and 22% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 4.4 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 1.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 4.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Joško Gvardiol and 16.3% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.4 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £5.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against Lewis Hall at 6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 15.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 7.6 for Maxim De Cuyper, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Maxim De Cuyper is averaging 7.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.5% for Marc Guéhi and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marc Guéhi.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £6.1m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3.1 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 22.9% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.4 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 25.5% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Brian Brobbey.
|
Priced at £9.1m and £7.8m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 3.6 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 22% and 9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 4.4 for Gameweek 6, against 2.6 for Gonzalo, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 4.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 22% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.
|
Priced at £7.6m and £6.2m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 2.5 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.8 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Brian Brobbey at 4.8 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Brian Brobbey has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8% for Thierno Barry and 8.5% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Thierno Barry.
|
Priced at £5.6m and £5.7m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.6 against Brian Brobbey at 4.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 8% and 5.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Thierno Barry the clear short-term pick. Thierno Barry carries 4.0 expected points and 4.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.








