The expected points model has João Pedro at 10.0 for Gameweek 3, against 7.5 for Erling Haaland, a gap of 2.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: João Pedro has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Erling Haaland is averaging 7.5 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, João Pedro leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, João Pedro edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; João Pedro has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 16.9% for Alexander Isak and 69.4% for João Pedro, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 10.0 expected points for João Pedro.
|


Priced at £12.0m and £7.5m, there is a £4.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bruno Fernandes generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.1 against Morgan Rogers at 1.7. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 12.5 projected points. With ownership at 48.6% and 24.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 10.0 for Gameweek 3, against 6.5 for Gabriel, a gap of 3.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 6.5 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 17. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 44.2% for Riccardo Calafiori and 16% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 10.0 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.
|


Priced at £5.7m and £4.0m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 3.5 against Issa Diop at 1. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 10.0 projected points. With ownership at 44.2% and 15.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 7.5 for Gameweek 3, against 6.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 7.5 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 6.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Dominik Szoboszlai leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Dominik Szoboszlai edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Declan Rice has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.5% for Declan Rice and 41.3% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Dominik Szoboszlai.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £9.6m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Cole Palmer generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 1.6 against Cole Palmer at 2.1. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 10.0 projected points. With ownership at 28% and 18.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 6.5 for Gameweek 3, against 2.0 for Issa Diop, a gap of 4.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 6.5 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Issa Diop is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Yoane Wissa leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Yoane Wissa edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 25.9% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 13.9% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Yoane Wissa.
|
Priced at £7.5m and £7.5m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Declan Rice at 1.1 against Morgan Rogers at 1.7. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 6.5 projected points. With ownership at 14.5% and 24.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 7.0 for Gameweek 3, against 6.0 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 7.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 6.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Nico O'Reilly leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Nico O'Reilly edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Nico O'Reilly has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.8% for Nico O'Reilly and 16% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 2.0 expected points for Nico O'Reilly.
|
Priced at £5.6m and £4.5m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 2.5 against Luke Shaw at 0.7. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.0 projected points. With ownership at 18.6% and 16% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Harry Maguire at 2.5 for Gameweek 3, against 2.0 for Nico O'Reilly, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Harry Maguire has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Nico O'Reilly is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Declan Rice has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.4% for Cole Palmer and 14.5% for Declan Rice, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 10.0 expected points for Cole Palmer.
|


Priced at £6.0m and £7.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 1.5 against Kai Havertz at 1.1. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 4.5 projected points. With ownership at 25.9% and 6.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Yoane Wissa at 6.0 for Gameweek 3, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Yoane Wissa has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Viktor Gyökeres has a Blank Gameweek 3 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 4.5 expected points and 4.5 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
Priced at £5.0m and £4.5m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Harry Maguire generates more points per million this season. Harry Maguire at 1 against Luke Shaw at 0.7. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Harry Maguire the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 16% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 7.5 for Gameweek 3, against 4.0 for Declan Rice, a gap of 3.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 7.5 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Declan Rice is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 9.4% for Brian Brobbey and 16.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.
|
Priced at £5.9m and £8.0m, there is a £2.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 0.7 against Igor Thiago at 0.3. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 2.0 projected points. With ownership at 9.4% and 14.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 4.0 for Gameweek 3, against 1.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW3. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.








