FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 3

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.9% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 71.7% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £7.0m, there is a £5.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bruno Fernandes generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.1 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 1.7. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 12.5 projected points. With ownership at 48.6% and 41.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.5 for Gameweek 3, against 6.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.5 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 6.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, João Pedro leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, João Pedro edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. João Pedro has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 69.4% for João Pedro and 14.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 10.0 expected points for João Pedro.

|

Priced at £5.9m and £15.5m, there is a £9.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 0.7 against Erling Haaland at 1. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.5 projected points. With ownership at 9.4% and 71.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Viktor Gyökeres has a Blank Gameweek 3 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 7.5 expected points and 7.5 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, João Pedro leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, João Pedro edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; João Pedro has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 6.8% for Kai Havertz and 69.4% for João Pedro, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 10.0 expected points for João Pedro.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.0m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 3.5 against Marc Guéhi at 2. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 10.0 projected points. With ownership at 44.2% and 18.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 11.0 for Gameweek 3, against 3.5 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 7.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 11.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Christos Tzolis has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 28% for Bryan Mbeumo and 20.1% for Christos Tzolis, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 6.5 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £7.7m and £9.6m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 2.9 against Cole Palmer at 2.1. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 11.0 projected points. With ownership at 29.2% and 18.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 6.5 for Gameweek 3, against 4.0 for Declan Rice, a gap of 2.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 6.5 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Declan Rice is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Gabriel edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.6% for Gabriel and 16% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 6.5 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £8.5m and £6.5m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Christos Tzolis generates more points per million this season. Antoine Semenyo at 0.8 against Christos Tzolis at 0.9. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 20.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Yoane Wissa at 6.0 for Gameweek 3, against 4.5 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Yoane Wissa has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 4.5 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 15.4% for Pascal Groß and 24.3% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £6.5m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 2.5 against Virgil at 0.5. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.0 projected points. With ownership at 18.6% and 17.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Harry Maguire at 2.5 for Gameweek 3, against 2.0 for Nico O'Reilly, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Harry Maguire has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Nico O'Reilly is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Harry Maguire has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18.6% for Joško Gvardiol and 14.3% for Harry Maguire, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 7.0 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £5.0m and £6.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Harry Maguire generates more points per million this season. Harry Maguire at 1 against Virgil at 0.5. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Harry Maguire the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 17.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Yoane Wissa at 6.0 for Gameweek 3, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Yoane Wissa has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 2 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 9.4% for Brian Brobbey and 16.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £5.9m and £8.0m, there is a £2.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 0.7 against Igor Thiago at 0.3. The Gameweek 3 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 2.0 projected points. With ownership at 9.4% and 14.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 3 with no fixture scheduled, making Yoane Wissa the clear short-term pick. Yoane Wissa carries 6.0 expected points and 6.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 9.4% for Brian Brobbey and 6.8% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 3, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Kai Havertz.

|