FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £8.2m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.7 against Morgan Rogers at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 46.9% and 52.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Charalampos Kostoulas, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Charalampos Kostoulas is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 5 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 28.1% for Cole Palmer and 52.6% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £6.7m and £8.2m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Morgan Rogers at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 16.5% and 52.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 3.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 2.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists. Ownership sits at 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard and 46.9% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £6.2m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.7 against Kevin Schade at 7.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 3.2 projected points. With ownership at 46.9% and 14.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 35.2% for Rayan Cherki and 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £9.8m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6 against Cole Palmer at 4.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 20.3% and 28.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 3.8 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Kevin Schade and 27.9% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £5.7m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 6.2 against Joško Gvardiol at 7.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 1.8 projected points. With ownership at 15.9% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 3.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Gabriel edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gabriel has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 24.6% for Gabriel and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £11.7m and £6.2m, there is a £5.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Kevin Schade generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Kevin Schade at 7.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Kevin Schade the edge at 1.5 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 14.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 3.5 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Nicolas Jackson leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Nicolas Jackson edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 26.3% for Nicolas Jackson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Nicolas Jackson.

|

Priced at £9.2m and £5.8m, there is a £3.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 5.8 against Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 21.9% and 10.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 4.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 20.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.2 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.

|

Priced at £7.4m and £9.2m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 4.5 against Alexander Isak at 5.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 5.7% and 21.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.8 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 3.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Igor Thiago edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 5.7% for Kai Havertz and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.

|