

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 16. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.4% for Francisco Evanilson and 79% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.
|
Priced at £15.8m and £6.0m, there is a £9.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 4.3 against Yoane Wissa at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.2 projected points. With ownership at 79% and 9.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 25. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 45.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 25.8% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.
|
Priced at £5.4m and £4.8m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against Ezri Konsa at 10.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 45.2% and 23.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 3.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 48% for Riccardo Calafiori and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.
|
Priced at £5.4m and £6.4m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 45.2% and 15% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Marcus Tavernier at 6.0 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marcus Tavernier has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 35.2% for Rayan Cherki and 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £4.8m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 7.7 against Ezri Konsa at 10.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 25.8% and 23.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 0.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 2.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 0.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists this season; Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.9% for Alexander Isak and 26.3% for Nicolas Jackson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Nicolas Jackson.
|
Priced at £5.3m and £4.8m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 7.9 against Ezri Konsa at 10.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 19.8% and 23.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 3.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 19.8% for Lewis Hall and 19% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Lewis Hall.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £8.0m, there is a £3.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Gabriel at 7.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 12.4% and 24.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Kevin Schade at 1.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kevin Schade has averaged 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 17. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 15.9% for Marc Guéhi and 19% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.
|


Priced at £9.2m and £5.8m, there is a £3.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 5.8 against Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 21.9% and 10.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Virgil at 3.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 20.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.
|


Priced at £5.8m and £6.0m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8 against Yoane Wissa at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Charalampos Kostoulas the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 10.2% and 9.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Charalampos Kostoulas, a gap of 1.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Igor Thiago has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Charalampos Kostoulas is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Igor Thiago edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW10. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.









