FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 2

Across the season, Dominik Szoboszlai leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Dominik Szoboszlai edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.8% for Bruno Fernandes and 42% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £9.0m and £7.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 0.2 against João Pedro at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 2.7 projected points. With ownership at 17% and 64% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has João Pedro at 2.4 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Brian Brobbey has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while João Pedro is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.8% for Bruno Fernandes and 25.9% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £15.5m and £4.5m, there is a £11.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 0.1 against Jonah Kusi-Asare at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 69% and 7.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 2.9 for Gameweek 2, against 2.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominik Szoboszlai has averaged 8.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 37.8% for Bryan Mbeumo and 25.9% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.9 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £4.5m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 1.6 against Ezri Konsa at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 40.4% and 12.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 2.9 for Gameweek 2, against 2.3 for Christos Tzolis, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Christos Tzolis has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Florian Wirtz has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 37.8% for Bryan Mbeumo and 12.6% for Florian Wirtz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £8.0m, there is a £4.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 0.5 against Gabriel at 0.6. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 18.1% and 29.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 2.9 for Gameweek 2, against 2.2 for Iliman Ndiaye, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Iliman Ndiaye has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Issa Diop leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Nico O'Reilly has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.1% for Issa Diop and 21.4% for Nico O'Reilly, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 3.1 expected points for Nico O'Reilly.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £4.5m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Issa Diop generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 0.5 against Luke Shaw at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Luke Shaw the edge at 1.7 projected points. With ownership at 18.1% and 20.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 3.1 for Gameweek 2, against 2.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.1% for Issa Diop and 17.6% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Marc Guéhi.

|

Priced at £6.5m and £4.0m, there is a £2.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Nico O'Reilly generates more points per million this season. Nico O'Reilly at 0.3 against Milan van Ewijk at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Nico O'Reilly the edge at 3.1 projected points. With ownership at 21.4% and 13.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 2.7 for Gameweek 2, against 2.5 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Declan Rice leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Declan Rice edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Declan Rice has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Florian Wirtz has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.9% for Declan Rice and 12.6% for Florian Wirtz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.6 expected points for Declan Rice.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £4.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 1.7 against Ezri Konsa at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 17.6% and 12.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 2.4 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.1 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 6.3% for Kai Havertz and 17% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.7 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £7.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 0.3 against Viktor Gyökeres at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Viktor Gyökeres the edge at 2.4 projected points. With ownership at 13.9% and 8.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 2.4 for Gameweek 2, against 2.0 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Viktor Gyökeres leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Viktor Gyökeres edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Viktor Gyökeres has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Ollie Watkins has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.4% for Viktor Gyökeres and 10.1% for Ollie Watkins, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Ollie Watkins.

|