Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; João Pedro has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 69% for Erling Haaland and 64% for João Pedro, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|
Priced at £12.0m and £8.0m, there is a £4.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 0.2 against Bryan Mbeumo at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.8% and 37.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 2.5 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 69% for Erling Haaland and 17% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|
Priced at £7.5m and £4.5m, there is a £3.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, João Pedro generates more points per million this season. João Pedro at 0 against Jonah Kusi-Asare at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives João Pedro the edge at 2.4 projected points. With ownership at 64% and 7.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 4.0 for Gameweek 2, against 2.6 for Declan Rice, a gap of 1.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Declan Rice has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Antoine Semenyo
Across the season, Dominik Szoboszlai leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Dominik Szoboszlai edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.9% for Antoine Semenyo and 42% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.9 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.
|
Priced at £5.5m and £6.5m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 1.6 against Virgil at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 3.1 projected points. With ownership at 40.4% and 19.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 2.5 for Gameweek 2, against 1.7 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 9.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14% for Pascal Groß and 37.8% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.
|
Priced at £7.5m and £8.5m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Antoine Semenyo generates more points per million this season. Morgan Rogers at 0 against Antoine Semenyo at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 2.9 projected points. With ownership at 24.3% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Declan Rice at 2.6 for Gameweek 2, against 2.6 for Morgan Rogers, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Declan Rice has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Nico O'Reilly leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Nico O'Reilly edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Nico O'Reilly has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.4% for Nico O'Reilly and 20.8% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 3.1 expected points for Nico O'Reilly.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £7.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Iliman Ndiaye generates more points per million this season. Iliman Ndiaye at 1.5 against Morgan Rogers at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 2.6 projected points. With ownership at 16% and 24.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Nico O'Reilly at 3.1 for Gameweek 2, against 2.2 for Harry Maguire, a gap of 0.9 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nico O'Reilly has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Harry Maguire is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Luke Shaw has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.6% for Marc Guéhi and 20.8% for Luke Shaw, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Marc Guéhi.
|
Priced at £4.0m and £5.0m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Issa Diop generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 0.5 against Harry Maguire at 0.2. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Harry Maguire the edge at 2.2 projected points. With ownership at 18.1% and 17.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Virgil at 3.1 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Milan van Ewijk, a gap of 2.1 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Milan van Ewijk is averaging 1.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Harry Maguire leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Harry Maguire edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Harry Maguire has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Milan van Ewijk has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.9% for Harry Maguire and 13.6% for Milan van Ewijk, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.2 expected points for Harry Maguire.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £4.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 1.7 against Milan van Ewijk at 0.3. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 17.6% and 13.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Declan Rice at 2.6 for Gameweek 2, against 2.6 for Florian Wirtz, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Declan Rice has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Florian Wirtz is averaging 2.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Ollie Watkins has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17% for Alexander Isak and 10.1% for Ollie Watkins, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.7 expected points for Alexander Isak.
|
Priced at £4.5m and £8.0m, there is a £3.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Jonah Kusi-Asare generates more points per million this season. Jonah Kusi-Asare at 0 against Igor Thiago at 0. The Gameweek 2 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 7.4% and 17.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
Alexander Isak
The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 2.7 for Gameweek 2, against 1.0 for Jonah Kusi-Asare, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Jonah Kusi-Asare is averaging 0.0. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.9% for Brian Brobbey and 6.3% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 2, the model projects 2.4 expected points for Kai Havertz.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW2. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.