

The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 7.2 for Erling Haaland, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Erling Haaland is averaging 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 21.6% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|
Priced at £7.9m and £8.1m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 5.7 against Morgan Rogers at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 35.6% and 52.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 5 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 16.6% for Martin Ødegaard and 52.4% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Morgan Rogers.
|
Priced at £11.7m and £6.2m, there is a £5.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Pascal Groß at 9.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 3.2 projected points. With ownership at 21.6% and 46.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.5 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 3.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 28. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Morgan Rogers has 5 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 52.4% for Morgan Rogers and 13.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Morgan Rogers.
|
Priced at £5.4m and £5.3m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against Lewis Hall at 7.9. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 44.9% and 20% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Virgil, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 35.6% for Rayan Cherki and 16.6% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £4.7m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 7.7 against Ezri Konsa at 10.4. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 26% and 22.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Gabriel edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gabriel has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 24.4% for Gabriel and 22.9% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.
|


Priced at £6.2m and £6.6m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Marcus Tavernier generates more points per million this season. Kevin Schade at 7.3 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 27.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 7.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.6% for Bruno Fernandes and 16.6% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.
|
Priced at £7.9m and £6.2m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Kevin Schade generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6 against Kevin Schade at 7.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 20.5% and 14.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 0.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 4.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 0.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 12.5% for Semi Ajayi and 18.9% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £6.4m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 6.2 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 16% and 15.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 4.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Francisco Evanilson leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Francisco Evanilson edges the combined goals and assists count with 8 direct contributions. Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.8% for Francisco Evanilson and 5.6% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.
|


Priced at £5.8m and £7.8m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8 against Igor Thiago at 4.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 10.2% and 9.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Charalampos Kostoulas at 4.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Charalampos Kostoulas has averaged 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW10. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.










