

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.8 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 3.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 47.9% for Riccardo Calafiori and 44.9% for Maxim De Cuyper, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.
|


Priced at £15.8m and £5.8m, there is a £10.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 4.3 against Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.2 projected points. With ownership at 79% and 10.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 47.9% for Riccardo Calafiori and 22.9% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.
|


Priced at £6.7m and £8.1m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Morgan Rogers at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 16.6% and 52.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 47.9% for Riccardo Calafiori and 16% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.
|
Priced at £7.9m and £9.8m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 5.7 against Cole Palmer at 4.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 35.6% and 28% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 35.6% for Rayan Cherki and 14.3% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.
|


Priced at £7.9m and £6.7m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 5.7 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 35.6% and 13.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 4 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 21.6% for Bruno Fernandes and 20.5% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.
|
Priced at £5.3m and £6.2m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 7.9 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 20% and 18.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 2.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 4 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 16.6% for Martin Ødegaard and 20.5% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.
|
Priced at £7.9m and £6.2m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Kevin Schade generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6 against Kevin Schade at 7.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 20.5% and 14.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.2 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 21.6% for Alexander Isak and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.
|


Priced at £5.6m and £6.1m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 7 against Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 7.6% and 20.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 7.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Virgil leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Semi Ajayi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 12.5% for Semi Ajayi and 15.1% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.5 expected points for Virgil.
|


Priced at £5.8m and £6.0m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8 against Yoane Wissa at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Charalampos Kostoulas the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 10.2% and 9.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Charalampos Kostoulas at 4.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Charalampos Kostoulas has averaged 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW10. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.






