

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.4 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 3.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 4.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.1% for Thierno Barry and 73.5% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 7.8 expected points and 7.8 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|


The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 4.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 4.5 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 39% for Bruno Fernandes and 15.8% for Morgan Gibbs-White, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.2 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.
|
Priced at £5.8m and £9.7m, there is a £3.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 8.1 against Cole Palmer at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 26.5% and 26.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 22. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 26.5% for Pascal Groß and 20.9% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 9.4 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £5.7m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 5 against Joško Gvardiol at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 18.4% and 26.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 7.4 for Gameweek 6, against 6.2 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 7.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Morgan Gibbs-White leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 15.8% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 26.6% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.
|
Priced at £9.7m and £8.4m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Antoine Semenyo generates more points per million this season. Cole Palmer at 2.9 against Antoine Semenyo at 3.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.6% and 15.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 4.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 4.5 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Morgan Gibbs-White leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 15.8% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 20.9% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.
|


Priced at £6.8m and £8.0m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Gibbs-White the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 15.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.4% for Marc Guéhi and 16.3% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marc Guéhi.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £6.1m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 5 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 18.4% and 15.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 22.1% for Alexander Isak and 9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £6.5m, there is a £2.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 5.4 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 2.8 for Gonzalo, a gap of 3.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Yoane Wissa the clear short-term pick. Yoane Wissa carries 3.0 expected points and 3.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £6.2m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Yoane Wissa generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2.3 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Yoane Wissa the edge at 3.0 projected points. With ownership at 3.8% and 18.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.













