

Priced at £6.0m and £5.3m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 7.3 against Maxim De Cuyper at 11.1. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 10.5 projected points. With ownership at 54.1% and 41.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 9.5 for Gameweek 8, against 4.5 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 9.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 4.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, João Pedro leads on total points and the gap stands at 29. On attacking output, João Pedro edges the combined goals and assists count with 8 direct contributions. João Pedro has 5 goals and 3 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 73.1% for João Pedro and 13.6% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 7.0 expected points for João Pedro.
|


Priced at £6.0m and £5.8m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 7.3 against Joško Gvardiol at 7.1. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 7.5 projected points. With ownership at 54.1% and 28% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 7.5 for Gameweek 8, against 2.0 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 5.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 7.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 54.1% for Riccardo Calafiori and 17.7% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.
|
Priced at £6.2m and £7.8m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.4 against Bryan Mbeumo at 5.3. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 45.7% and 20.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 8.0 for Gameweek 8, against 5.0 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 8.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 28. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists. Ownership sits at 11.5% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 45.7% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|
Priced at £6.2m and £7.3m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.4 against Declan Rice at 4.9. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Declan Rice the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 45.7% and 11.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 5.0 for Gameweek 8, against 1.0 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 4.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 28% for Joško Gvardiol and 20.4% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 2.0 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.
|
Priced at £5.8m and £4.6m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 7.1 against Ezri Konsa at 5.4. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 6.5 projected points. With ownership at 28% and 18% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 5.0 for Gameweek 8, against 2.0 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 21.1% for Gabriel and 18.3% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Gabriel.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £5.3m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 6.2 against Lewis Hall at 6.6. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 17.7% and 20.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 6.5 for Gameweek 8, against 3.5 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 6.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 20.4% for Lewis Hall and 15.2% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 2.0 expected points for Lewis Hall.
|
Priced at £6.2m and £6.4m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. James Tarkowski at 7.4 against Virgil at 4.5. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 2.0 projected points. With ownership at 18.3% and 15.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 3.5 for Gameweek 8, against 1.5 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.2% for Thierno Barry and 13.3% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 4.5 expected points for Alexander Isak.
|
Priced at £6.1m and £6.1m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Gonzalo generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 3 against Yoane Wissa at 3. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Gonzalo the edge at 2.0 projected points. With ownership at 6.8% and 13.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 4.5 for Gameweek 8, against 2.0 for Gonzalo, a gap of 2.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 4.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 9.9% for Charalampos Kostoulas and 8.8% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 8, the model projects 6.5 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.
|
Priced at £6.1m and £7.8m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Gonzalo generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 3 against Igor Thiago at 2.3. The Gameweek 8 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 6.8% and 8.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW8. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.












