

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 25. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 26.3% for Nicolas Jackson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Nicolas Jackson.
|
Priced at £15.8m and £9.2m, there is a £6.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 4.3 against Alexander Isak at 5.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.2 projected points. With ownership at 79% and 21.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 35. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 5.7% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|
Priced at £9.8m and £8.2m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Cole Palmer at 4.6 against Morgan Rogers at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 28.2% and 52.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 27. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 45.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 19.8% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.
|
Priced at £6.7m and £6.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Pascal Groß at 9.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 3.2 projected points. With ownership at 16.5% and 46.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Virgil, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 12.4% for Semi Ajayi and 48% for Riccardo Calafiori, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.
|


Priced at £9.8m and £6.6m, there is a £3.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Marcus Tavernier generates more points per million this season. Cole Palmer at 4.6 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 28.2% and 27.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 25.8% for Joško Gvardiol and 19% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.
|
Priced at £6.7m and £9.8m, there is a £3.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Cole Palmer at 4.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 16.5% and 28.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 5.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.8% for Joško Gvardiol and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.5 expected points for Virgil.
|
Priced at £4.8m and £6.4m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 10.2 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 23.2% and 15% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Charalampos Kostoulas, a gap of 4.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Charalampos Kostoulas is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 4 goals and 1 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 20.3% for Bryan Mbeumo and 14.2% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.
|
Priced at £5.6m and £7.0m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 7 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 7.7% and 26.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 0.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 4.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 0.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Francisco Evanilson leads on total points and the gap stands at 20. On attacking output, Francisco Evanilson edges the combined goals and assists count with 8 direct contributions. Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 18.4% for Francisco Evanilson and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £6.4m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 12.4% and 15% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.8 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 3.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 5.7% for Kai Havertz and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.2 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW10. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.









