Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|


Priced at £5.9m and £4.8m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 8.6 against Ezri Konsa at 10.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 48% and 23.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 7.8 for Maxim De Cuyper, a gap of 1.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Maxim De Cuyper is averaging 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 48% for Riccardo Calafiori and 19.8% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.
|


Priced at £8.2m and £6.7m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Morgan Rogers at 6.1 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 52.6% and 13.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 32. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 45.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 15.9% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.
|
Priced at £6.2m and £6.2m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.7 against Kevin Schade at 7.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 3.2 projected points. With ownership at 46.9% and 14.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.5 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 1.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 35.2% for Rayan Cherki and 13.4% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.
|


Priced at £6.1m and £7.0m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 6.1 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 20.7% and 26.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 3.8 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 4 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 21.5% for Bruno Fernandes and 20.3% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.
|


Priced at £9.8m and £6.7m, there is a £3.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Cole Palmer generates more points per million this season. Cole Palmer at 4.6 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 28.1% and 13.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Virgil at 3.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Ezri Konsa leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Ezri Konsa edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 23.2% for Ezri Konsa and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.
|


Priced at £5.8m and £7.0m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 10.2% and 26.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 4.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 3.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 19% for James Tarkowski and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.5 expected points for Virgil.
|


Priced at £7.9m and £6.7m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 20.3% and 13.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Charalampos Kostoulas, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Charalampos Kostoulas is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 17. On attacking output, Martin Ødegaard edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard and 13.4% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £6.0m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Marc Guéhi at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 2.2 projected points. With ownership at 12.4% and 15.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Igor Thiago edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 5.7% for Kai Havertz and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW10. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.











