FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 2.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 31. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 20.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 79% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £15.8m and £5.8m, there is a £10.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 4.3 against Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.2 projected points. With ownership at 79% and 10.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 3.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 5 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 28.1% for Cole Palmer and 52.6% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £11.7m and £8.2m, there is a £3.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Morgan Rogers at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 52.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.2 for Gameweek 10, against 4.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 25. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 45.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £5.4m and £6.2m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 45.2% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 3.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.5 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 30. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 45.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £5.7m, there is a £2.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against Joško Gvardiol at 7.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.6% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 7.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 24.6% for Gabriel and 19% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £9.8m and £6.7m, there is a £3.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Cole Palmer generates more points per million this season. Cole Palmer at 4.6 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 28.1% and 13.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Virgil, a gap of 4.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 12.4% for Semi Ajayi and 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.2 expected points for Semi Ajayi.

|

Priced at £4.8m and £6.4m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 10.2 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 23.2% and 15% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 19% for James Tarkowski and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.5 expected points for Virgil.

|

Priced at £9.2m and £7.8m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 5.8 against Igor Thiago at 4.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 21.9% and 9.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 4.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 20.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.0m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8 against Yoane Wissa at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Charalampos Kostoulas the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 10.2% and 9.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 3.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|