FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

Priced at £15.8m and £7.0m, there is a £8.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Nicolas Jackson generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 4.3 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 79% and 25.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Charalampos Kostoulas, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Charalampos Kostoulas is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 48. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 9.9% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £15.8m and £7.4m, there is a £8.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 4.3 against Kai Havertz at 4.5. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.2 projected points. With ownership at 79% and 5.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marcus Tavernier at 6.0 for Gameweek 10, against 3.2 for Pascal Groß, a gap of 2.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marcus Tavernier has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Pascal Groß is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 47.9% for Riccardo Calafiori and 20% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £5.4m and £4.7m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against Ezri Konsa at 10.4. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 44.9% and 22.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Virgil, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 38. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 46.9% for Pascal Groß and 13.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £5.4m and £6.4m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 44.9% and 15.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 0.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 2.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 0.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 20. On attacking output, Marcus Tavernier edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.6% for Bruno Fernandes and 27.4% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.

|

Priced at £6.7m and £6.6m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Marcus Tavernier generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 16.6% and 27.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 3.8 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 16% for Marc Guéhi and 26% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 1.8 expected points for Marc Guéhi.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against Marc Guéhi at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.4% and 16% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 3.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 20% for Lewis Hall and 18.9% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Lewis Hall.

|

Priced at £11.7m and £6.7m, there is a £5.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Martin Ødegaard at 5.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 21.6% and 16.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.6% for Bruno Fernandes and 13.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 1.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £6.4m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. James Tarkowski at 8.7 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 18.9% and 15.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 0.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 4.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 0.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.3% for Kevin Schade and 13.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 1.5 expected points for Kevin Schade.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £7.4m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 7 against Kai Havertz at 4.5. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 7.6% and 5.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|