FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £15.8m and £7.8m, there is a £8.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 4.3 against Igor Thiago at 4.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.2 projected points. With ownership at 79% and 9.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 3.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 47.9% for Riccardo Calafiori and 26% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £7.9m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.7 against Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 46.9% and 20.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.5 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 3.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists. Ownership sits at 16.6% for Martin Ødegaard and 46.9% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £6.7m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.7 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 3.2 projected points. With ownership at 46.9% and 13.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 0.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 2.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 0.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists this season; Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.6% for Alexander Isak and 25.8% for Nicolas Jackson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Nicolas Jackson.

|

Priced at £6.1m and £7.0m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 6.1 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 20.9% and 25.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 16.6% for Martin Ødegaard and 28% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.2 expected points for Cole Palmer.

|

Priced at £4.7m and £6.4m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 10.4 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 22.9% and 15.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Charalampos Kostoulas, a gap of 4.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Charalampos Kostoulas is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.9% for James Tarkowski and 15.1% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.5 expected points for Virgil.

|

Priced at £9.2m and £5.8m, there is a £3.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 5.8 against Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 21.6% and 10.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.2 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 21.6% for Alexander Isak and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.

|

Priced at £6.4m and £6.0m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Francisco Evanilson generates more points per million this season. Francisco Evanilson at 8.1 against Yoane Wissa at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Francisco Evanilson the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 17.8% and 9.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 4.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 3.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Francisco Evanilson leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Francisco Evanilson edges the combined goals and assists count with 8 direct contributions. Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.8% for Francisco Evanilson and 5.6% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £7.8m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8 against Igor Thiago at 4.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 10.2% and 9.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 3.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 5.6% for Kai Havertz and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.2 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.

|