Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 29. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 74% for Erling Haaland and 9.3% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £15.6m, there is a £9.9m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.5 against Erling Haaland at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.5 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 74% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 7.5 expected points and 7.5 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Bukayo Saka leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Bukayo Saka has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 38.3% for Bruno Fernandes and 14.8% for Bukayo Saka, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Bukayo Saka.
|


Priced at £7.8m and £6.8m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 4.4 against Martin Ødegaard at 4.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 4.5 projected points. With ownership at 28.5% and 19.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 15.5 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 10.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 15.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 28.7% for Maxim De Cuyper and 17.3% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 11.0 expected points for James Tarkowski.
|
Priced at £5.9m and £6.2m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 8 against Kevin Schade at 6.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 15.5 projected points. With ownership at 31% and 12.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 8.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Issa Diop, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Issa Diop is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 22.7% for Gabriel and 18.3% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.5 expected points for Lewis Hall.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £6.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3.1 against Marc Guéhi at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 22.7% and 18% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 11.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Gabriel, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 11.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 25. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 12.5% for Issa Diop and 27% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £6.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Virgil generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3.1 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 22.7% and 16.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 4.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18.3% for Lewis Hall and 17.3% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 11.0 expected points for James Tarkowski.
|
Priced at £7.9m and £9.6m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bukayo Saka generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 3.2 against Bukayo Saka at 3.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bukayo Saka the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 20.4% and 14.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.5 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 5.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Bukayo Saka leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Bukayo Saka has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 15.7% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 14.8% for Bukayo Saka, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £6.5m, there is a £2.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 13.9% and 16.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Emersonn at 7.0 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Emersonn has averaged 7.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Gonzalo leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Gonzalo edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 4.7% for Gonzalo and 9.3% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.0 expected points for Igor Thiago.
|
Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Igor Thiago the clear short-term pick. Igor Thiago carries 3.0 expected points and 3.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
The expected points model has Emersonn at 7.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Gonzalo, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Emersonn has averaged 7.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Emersonn the clear short-term pick. Emersonn carries 7.0 expected points and 7.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.














