FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 16. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.8% for Francisco Evanilson and 79% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.

|

Priced at £5.9m and £5.7m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 8.6 against Joško Gvardiol at 7.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 47.9% and 26% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 47.9% for Riccardo Calafiori and 20% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £7.9m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.7 against Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 46.9% and 20.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 2.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 47.9% for Riccardo Calafiori and 15.1% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £6.6m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Marcus Tavernier generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 5.7 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 35.6% and 27.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 4.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 35.6% for Rayan Cherki and 13.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £6.7m and £9.8m, there is a £3.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Cole Palmer at 4.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 16.6% and 28% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 5.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Francisco Evanilson leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Francisco Evanilson edges the combined goals and assists count with 8 direct contributions. Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists this season; Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.8% for Francisco Evanilson and 25.8% for Nicolas Jackson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £5.7m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 6.2 against Joško Gvardiol at 7.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 1.8 projected points. With ownership at 16% and 26% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 3.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Francisco Evanilson leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Francisco Evanilson edges the combined goals and assists count with 8 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 20.9% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 17.8% for Francisco Evanilson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.

|

Priced at £6.7m and £7.9m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 16.6% and 20.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Kevin Schade at 1.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kevin Schade has averaged 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Nicolas Jackson leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Nicolas Jackson edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 25.8% for Nicolas Jackson and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Nicolas Jackson.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £6.4m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. James Tarkowski at 8.7 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 18.9% and 15.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Charalampos Kostoulas, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Charalampos Kostoulas is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 20.9% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.2 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £6.7m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Kevin Schade generates more points per million this season. Kevin Schade at 7.3 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Kevin Schade the edge at 1.5 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 13.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Igor Thiago leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Igor Thiago edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 9.2% for Igor Thiago and 9.9% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.

|