FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 73.3% for Erling Haaland and 19.3% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £15.6m and £7.8m, there is a £7.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.1 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 73.3% and 8.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 2.2 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 3.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 39.9% for Bruno Fernandes and 27% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £5.8m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.2 against Riccardo Calafiori at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 50.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Morgan Rogers, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.5% for Bryan Mbeumo and 34.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.6 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £7.0m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 5.4 projected points. With ownership at 20.1% and 34.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 6.4 for Maxim De Cuyper, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Maxim De Cuyper is averaging 6.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £5.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 5.8 against Lewis Hall at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 25.9% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 23.1% for Gabriel and 14.9% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £8.0m, there is a £3.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.2 against Gabriel at 3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 23.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 3.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 21.5% for Bryan Mbeumo and 14.7% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.6 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £5.2m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 4.3 against Lewis Hall at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 18.6% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Semi Ajayi at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Semi Ajayi has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Gibbs-White leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 16% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 14.7% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.

|

Priced at £7.6m and £9.1m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 2.2 against Alexander Isak at 2.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 21.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 2.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Yoane Wissa leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Yoane Wissa edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 7.9% for Thierno Barry and 19.3% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.0 expected points for Yoane Wissa.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Yoane Wissa the clear short-term pick. Yoane Wissa carries 3.0 expected points and 3.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Yoane Wissa at 3.0 for Gameweek 6, against 1.4 for Brian Brobbey, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Yoane Wissa has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Brian Brobbey is averaging 1.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gonzalo leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Gonzalo edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.4% for Brian Brobbey and 3.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.4 expected points for Gonzalo.

|