

The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 2.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists. Ownership sits at 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard and 46.9% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|


Priced at £11.7m and £9.8m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Cole Palmer generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Cole Palmer at 4.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 21.4% and 28.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 7.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Nicolas Jackson leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Nicolas Jackson edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 20.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 26.4% for Nicolas Jackson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Nicolas Jackson.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £5.3m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 7.7 against Lewis Hall at 7.9. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 25.8% and 19.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 5.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 24.6% for Gabriel and 19% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Gabriel.
|
Priced at £5.3m and £4.8m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 7.9 against Ezri Konsa at 10.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 19.7% and 23.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 2.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 22. On attacking output, Semi Ajayi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Gabriel has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 12.4% for Semi Ajayi and 24.6% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Gabriel.
|


Priced at £6.7m and £7.9m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 16.5% and 20.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Kevin Schade at 1.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kevin Schade has averaged 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 12.4% for Semi Ajayi and 19.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Lewis Hall.
|
Priced at £7.4m and £7.0m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Nicolas Jackson generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 4.5 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 5.7% and 26.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 3.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Virgil leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 15.8% for Marc Guéhi and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.5 expected points for Virgil.
|


Priced at £5.6m and £6.1m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 7 against Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 7.7% and 20.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Dominic Calvert-Lewin leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 20.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 5.7% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.8 expected points for Dominic Calvert-Lewin.
|


Priced at £5.6m and £6.4m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Francisco Evanilson generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 7 against Francisco Evanilson at 8.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Francisco Evanilson the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 7.7% and 18.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 4.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Igor Thiago has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 9.7% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.
|
Priced at £7.4m and £6.0m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 4.5 against Yoane Wissa at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 5.7% and 9.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 1.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW10. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.









