FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £6.2m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 5.7 against Pascal Groß at 9.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 3.2 projected points. With ownership at 35.2% and 46.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 4.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.2 for Pascal Groß, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Pascal Groß is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Gabriel has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 48% for Riccardo Calafiori and 24.6% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £5.9m and £5.3m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 8.6 against Lewis Hall at 7.9. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 48% and 19.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.5 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 3.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists. Ownership sits at 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard and 46.9% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £11.7m and £7.9m, there is a £3.8m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Rayan Cherki at 5.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 21.4% and 35.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 6.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 35.2% for Rayan Cherki and 14.2% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £6.6m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Marcus Tavernier generates more points per million this season. Kevin Schade at 7.3 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 28% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 1.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 33. On attacking output, Marcus Tavernier edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.4% for Dominik Szoboszlai and 28% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against Marc Guéhi at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.6% and 15.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 2.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 21.4% for Bruno Fernandes and 14.2% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 1.5 expected points for Kevin Schade.

|

Priced at £5.3m and £6.4m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 7.9 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 19.7% and 15% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 4.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 3.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 19% for James Tarkowski and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.5 expected points for Virgil.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £6.2m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 12.4% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 3.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 20.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.0m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8 against Yoane Wissa at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Charalampos Kostoulas the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 10.2% and 9.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Igor Thiago has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 5.7% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.

|