Priced at £15.6m and £6.2m, there is a £9.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.5 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.5 projected points. With ownership at 74% and 18.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Charalampos Kostoulas at 10.0 for Gameweek 6, against 7.5 for Erling Haaland, a gap of 2.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Charalampos Kostoulas has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Erling Haaland is averaging 7.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 31% for Pascal Groß and 41.3% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 15.5 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|


Priced at £11.9m and £5.9m, there is a £6.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.6 against Pascal Groß at 8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 15.5 projected points. With ownership at 38.3% and 31% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 2.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 41.3% for Morgan Rogers and 12.9% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 12.0 expected points for Kevin Schade.
|
Priced at £5.0m and £8.0m, there is a £3.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6 against Gabriel at 3.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 28.7% and 22.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Kevin Schade at 12.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 10.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kevin Schade has averaged 12.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 22.7% for Gabriel and 27% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.
|


Priced at £9.6m and £6.9m, there is a £2.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bukayo Saka generates more points per million this season. Bukayo Saka at 3.3 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bukayo Saka the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 14.8% and 32% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Bukayo Saka at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 4.5 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bukayo Saka has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 4.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 22.7% for Gabriel and 18.3% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.5 expected points for Lewis Hall.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £5.7m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Joško Gvardiol at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.5 projected points. With ownership at 13.9% and 27% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 11.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Gabriel, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 11.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Morgan Gibbs-White leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 15.7% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 20.4% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.
|


Priced at £6.0m and £6.2m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 5 against James Tarkowski at 6.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 11.0 projected points. With ownership at 18% and 17.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Bukayo Saka at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bukayo Saka has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Yoane Wissa the clear short-term pick. Yoane Wissa carries 1.0 expected points and 1.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £6.2m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Yoane Wissa generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2.3 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gonzalo the edge at 2.0 projected points. With ownership at 4.7% and 18.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Thierno Barry the clear short-term pick. Thierno Barry carries 4.0 expected points and 4.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Emersonn leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Emersonn edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Emersonn has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Thierno Barry and 3.8% for Emersonn, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.0 expected points for Emersonn.
|
Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Gonzalo the clear short-term pick. Gonzalo carries 2.0 expected points and 2.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|


Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Charalampos Kostoulas the clear short-term pick. Charalampos Kostoulas carries 10.0 expected points and 10.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Emersonn leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Emersonn edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Emersonn has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 3.8% for Emersonn and 4.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.0 expected points for Emersonn.
|
Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Emersonn the clear short-term pick. Emersonn carries 7.0 expected points and 7.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.








