The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.5 for Gameweek 6, against 7.0 for Emersonn, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Emersonn is averaging 7.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 27% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.
|


Priced at £6.8m and £7.8m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Morgan Rogers at 3.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 41.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 15.5 for Gameweek 6, against 4.5 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 11.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 15.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 4.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Bukayo Saka leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Bukayo Saka has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 41.3% for Morgan Rogers and 14.8% for Bukayo Saka, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Rogers.
|


Priced at £5.0m and £5.7m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6 against Joško Gvardiol at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 28.7% and 27% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominik Szoboszlai has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 31% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 15.5 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|


Priced at £8.0m and £5.9m, there is a £2.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5 against Pascal Groß at 8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 15.5 projected points. With ownership at 15.7% and 31% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 15.5 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Bukayo Saka, a gap of 10.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 15.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bukayo Saka is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 28.5% for Rayan Cherki and 15.7% for Morgan Gibbs-White, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £6.2m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3.1 against James Tarkowski at 6.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 11.0 projected points. With ownership at 22.7% and 17.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 7.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Issa Diop, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 7.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Issa Diop is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Semi Ajayi leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Semi Ajayi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.9% for Semi Ajayi and 22.7% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Gabriel.
|
Priced at £6.2m and £6.5m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. James Tarkowski at 6.9 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 11.0 projected points. With ownership at 17.3% and 16.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Kevin Schade at 12.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 10.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kevin Schade has averaged 12.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Dominic Calvert-Lewin leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Thierno Barry and 24.4% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Dominic Calvert-Lewin.
|
Priced at £4.0m and £6.2m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 3 against James Tarkowski at 6.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 11.0 projected points. With ownership at 12.5% and 17.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 6.0 expected points and 6.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Thierno Barry and 18.8% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Thierno Barry.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £7.8m, there is a £2.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.5 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 9.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Charalampos Kostoulas at 10.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 7.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Charalampos Kostoulas has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Thierno Barry and 5.5% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 10.0 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £6.0m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.5 against Gonzalo at 2.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 4.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Emersonn at 7.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 4.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Emersonn has averaged 7.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.










