

Priced at £6.0m and £15.6m, there is a £9.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.7 against Erling Haaland at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 25.2% and 73.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.8 for Gameweek 6, against 6.6 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 29. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 73.5% for Erling Haaland and 9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|


Priced at £12.0m and £7.7m, there is a £4.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.6 against Morgan Rogers at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 6.2 projected points. With ownership at 39% and 40.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 50.6% for Riccardo Calafiori and 18.4% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marc Guéhi.
|
Priced at £5.8m and £6.5m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.6% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Antoine Semenyo leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Antoine Semenyo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 39% for Bruno Fernandes and 15.1% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.
|
Priced at £6.8m and £5.8m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Pascal Groß at 8.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 26.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6 for Gameweek 6, against 6.2 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 1.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26.4% for Joško Gvardiol and 16.3% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.4 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.
|


Priced at £4.9m and £6.1m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.7% and 15.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 9.4 for Gameweek 6, against 6.6 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 9.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Gabriel edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 22.9% for Gabriel and 16.3% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Gabriel.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £4.6m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 5 against Ezri Konsa at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 18.4% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Semi Ajayi at 5.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Gabriel, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Semi Ajayi has averaged 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18.4% for Marc Guéhi and 16.2% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.2 expected points for Lewis Hall.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £6.0m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Marc Guéhi at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 18.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.4 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Kai Havertz and 18.8% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Kai Havertz.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £7.8m, there is a £2.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 4.2 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 6.4% and 9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Brian Brobbey at 4.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Brian Brobbey has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Thierno Barry the clear short-term pick. Thierno Barry carries 4.0 expected points and 4.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
Priced at £5.6m and £6.0m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.6 against Gonzalo at 2.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 8.1% and 3.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.













