FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

Priced at £15.8m and £7.0m, there is a £8.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Nicolas Jackson generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 4.3 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 79% and 26.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 7.2 for Erling Haaland, a gap of 1.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Erling Haaland is averaging 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 48. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 9 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 79% for Erling Haaland and 9.7% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 7.2 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £6.6m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.7 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 46.9% and 28% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 3.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 20. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 45.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 23.2% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.

|

Priced at £5.9m and £6.2m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 8.6 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 48% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marcus Tavernier at 6.0 for Gameweek 10, against 4.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marcus Tavernier has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 16. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 24.6% for Gabriel and 19.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £6.6m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Marcus Tavernier generates more points per million this season. Kevin Schade at 7.3 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 28% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 3.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.8% for Joško Gvardiol and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.5 expected points for Virgil.

|

Priced at £6.4m and £9.2m, there is a £2.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Francisco Evanilson generates more points per million this season. Francisco Evanilson at 8.1 against Alexander Isak at 5.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Francisco Evanilson the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 18.5% and 22% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 6.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Ezri Konsa leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Ezri Konsa edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 23.2% for Ezri Konsa and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £7.0m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 10.2% and 26.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 7.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Nicolas Jackson leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Nicolas Jackson edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 26.4% for Nicolas Jackson and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Nicolas Jackson.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £5.3m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 6.2 against Lewis Hall at 7.9. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 15.8% and 19.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 22% for Alexander Isak and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £9.2m and £7.8m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 5.8 against Igor Thiago at 4.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 22% and 9.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 2.5 for Gameweek 10, against 0.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 0.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Kevin Schade and 13.4% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 1.5 expected points for Kevin Schade.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £7.4m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 7 against Kai Havertz at 4.5. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 7.7% and 5.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|