FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £15.6m and £9.1m, there is a £6.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.1 against Alexander Isak at 2.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 73.3% and 21.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 4.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 16. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 73.3% for Erling Haaland and 8.5% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 6.6 expected points and 6.6 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 39.9% for Bruno Fernandes and 34.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £9.7m, there is a £2.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Cole Palmer generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.4 against Cole Palmer at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 39.9% and 27% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 28% for Rayan Cherki and 21.5% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £8.4m and £7.0m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Dominik Szoboszlai generates more points per million this season. Antoine Semenyo at 1.9 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Dominik Szoboszlai the edge at 3.6 projected points. With ownership at 14.7% and 34.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.6 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 28% for Rayan Cherki and 20.1% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.4 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.1m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 5.8 against James Tarkowski at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 25.9% and 14.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 6.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 6.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 23.1% for Gabriel and 14.1% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £8.4m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 2.9 against Antoine Semenyo at 1.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 4.6 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 14.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18.6% for Marc Guéhi and 14.9% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Marc Guéhi.

|

Priced at £5.2m and £6.5m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 3.5 against Virgil at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 3.6 projected points. With ownership at 14.9% and 16.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominic Calvert-Lewin leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 3.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Dominic Calvert-Lewin.

|

Priced at £5.2m and £6.1m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 3.5 against James Tarkowski at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 14.9% and 14.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Yoane Wissa at 3.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.4 for Gonzalo, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Yoane Wissa has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.9% for Thierno Barry and 8.9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £6.0m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 2.5 against Gonzalo at 2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 7.9% and 3.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|