FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 29. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 74% for Erling Haaland and 9.3% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £5.9m and £6.2m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.9 against James Tarkowski at 6.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 11.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 17.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 3.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Issa Diop, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Issa Diop is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 27. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 31% for Pascal Groß and 32% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 15.5 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £11.9m and £7.9m, there is a £4.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.6 against Bryan Mbeumo at 3.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 2.0 projected points. With ownership at 38.3% and 20.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 8.5 for Gameweek 6, against 7.5 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 7.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 28.7% for Maxim De Cuyper and 18.3% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £5.0m and £6.0m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6 against Marc Guéhi at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 28.7% and 18% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 7.5 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 2.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 7.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 12.9% for Kevin Schade and 32% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 12.0 expected points for Kevin Schade.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against James Tarkowski at 6.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 11.0 projected points. With ownership at 27% and 17.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 2.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 25. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 12.5% for Issa Diop and 27% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £8.0m, there is a £3.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Gabriel at 3.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 13.9% and 22.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bukayo Saka at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bukayo Saka has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.3% for Lewis Hall and 16.2% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.0 expected points for Virgil.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £6.2m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Kevin Schade generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 3.2 against Kevin Schade at 6.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kevin Schade the edge at 12.0 projected points. With ownership at 20.4% and 12.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Issa Diop, a gap of 2.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Issa Diop is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 31. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 12.5% for Issa Diop and 17.3% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 11.0 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.2m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Kevin Schade generates more points per million this season. Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5 against Kevin Schade at 6.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kevin Schade the edge at 12.0 projected points. With ownership at 15.7% and 12.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Issa Diop at 2.5 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Issa Diop has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Charalampos Kostoulas has 2 goals and 3 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 5.5% for Charalampos Kostoulas and 18.8% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 10.0 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Yoane Wissa the clear short-term pick. Yoane Wissa carries 1.0 expected points and 1.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Emersonn at 7.0 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Emersonn has averaged 7.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Emersonn leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Emersonn edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Emersonn has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 3.8% for Emersonn and 4.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.0 expected points for Emersonn.

|