FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £6.0m and £15.6m, there is a £9.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2.3 against Erling Haaland at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.5 projected points. With ownership at 4.7% and 74% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.5 for Gameweek 6, against 7.0 for Emersonn, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Emersonn is averaging 7.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 27% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £5.9m and £6.5m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.9 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 16.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Bukayo Saka, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bukayo Saka is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 41.3% for Morgan Rogers and 12.9% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 12.0 expected points for Kevin Schade.

|

Priced at £11.9m and £8.0m, there is a £3.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Gibbs-White generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.6 against Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Gibbs-White the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 38.3% and 15.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 8.5 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 3.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 31% for Pascal Groß and 12.9% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 15.5 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £5.0m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 13.9% and 28.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 8.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Issa Diop, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Issa Diop is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 22.7% for Gabriel and 18.3% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.5 expected points for Lewis Hall.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3.1 against Marc Guéhi at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 22.7% and 18% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 2.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18% for Marc Guéhi and 17.3% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 11.0 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £6.5m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 5 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 18% and 16.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Charalampos Kostoulas at 10.0 for Gameweek 6, against 6.0 for Dominic Calvert-Lewin, a gap of 4.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Charalampos Kostoulas has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Dominic Calvert-Lewin is averaging 6.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Virgil leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 12.5% for Issa Diop and 16.2% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.0 expected points for Virgil.

|

Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 6.0 expected points and 6.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Charalampos Kostoulas at 10.0 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 9.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Charalampos Kostoulas has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Emersonn leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Emersonn edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Emersonn has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 3.8% for Emersonn and 18.8% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.0 expected points for Emersonn.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £7.8m, there is a £2.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.5 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 9.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Charalampos Kostoulas at 10.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 7.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Charalampos Kostoulas has averaged 10.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Igor Thiago the clear short-term pick. Igor Thiago carries 3.0 expected points and 3.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £6.0m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Emersonn generates more points per million this season. Emersonn at 4.7 against Gonzalo at 2.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Emersonn the edge at 7.0 projected points. With ownership at 3.8% and 4.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|