

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 74% for Erling Haaland and 5.5% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 10.0 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.
|


Priced at £5.9m and £8.0m, there is a £2.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.9 against Gabriel at 3.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 22.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 15.5 for Gameweek 6, against 4.5 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 11.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 15.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 4.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 15.7% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 41.3% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.
|


Priced at £5.0m and £5.7m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6 against Joško Gvardiol at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 28.7% and 27% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 2.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 38.3% for Bruno Fernandes and 12.9% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 12.0 expected points for Kevin Schade.
|
Priced at £7.8m and £7.9m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 4.4 against Bryan Mbeumo at 3.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 4.5 projected points. With ownership at 28.5% and 20.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 8.5 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 3.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 27% for Joško Gvardiol and 18.3% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £5.7m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 5 against Joško Gvardiol at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.5 projected points. With ownership at 18% and 27% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 11.0 for Gameweek 6, against 7.5 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 3.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 11.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 7.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 22.7% for Gabriel and 18.3% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.5 expected points for Lewis Hall.
|


Priced at £6.8m and £7.9m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Bryan Mbeumo at 3.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 20.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.5 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Morgan Gibbs-White leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 15.7% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 20.4% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.
|
Priced at £5.3m and £6.2m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 5.8 against James Tarkowski at 6.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 11.0 projected points. With ownership at 18.3% and 17.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 2.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 17.3% for James Tarkowski and 16.2% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 11.0 expected points for James Tarkowski.
|


Priced at £5.7m and £6.0m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.5 against Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 24.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Semi Ajayi leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Semi Ajayi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 13.9% for Semi Ajayi and 12.5% for Issa Diop, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Issa Diop.
|
Priced at £5.7m and £6.0m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.5 against Gonzalo at 2.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 4.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Gonzalo the clear short-term pick. Gonzalo carries 2.0 expected points and 2.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.









