FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 2.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 28.5% for Rayan Cherki and 41.3% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £5.9m and £6.0m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.9 against Marc Guéhi at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 18% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 3.5 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 2.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 3.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 20.4% for Bryan Mbeumo and 41.3% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £7.8m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Morgan Rogers at 3.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 41.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 4.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 4.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 28.5% for Rayan Cherki and 31% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 15.5 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £11.9m and £6.8m, there is a £5.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.6 against Martin Ødegaard at 4.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 38.3% and 19.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 8.5 for Gameweek 6, against 7.5 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 7.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bukayo Saka leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Bukayo Saka has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 38.3% for Bruno Fernandes and 14.8% for Bukayo Saka, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Bukayo Saka.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £5.3m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against Lewis Hall at 5.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.5 projected points. With ownership at 27% and 18.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 7.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Issa Diop, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 7.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Issa Diop is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 15.7% for Morgan Gibbs-White, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.

|

Priced at £4.0m and £8.0m, there is a £4.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Issa Diop at 3 against Gabriel at 3.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 12.5% and 22.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 8.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 8.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 13.9% for Semi Ajayi and 18% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Marc Guéhi.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £6.5m, there is a £2.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 8.0 projected points. With ownership at 13.9% and 16.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Virgil at 8.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Issa Diop, a gap of 5.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Virgil has averaged 8.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Issa Diop is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 6.0 expected points and 6.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £5.5m and £6.2m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Emersonn generates more points per million this season. Emersonn at 4.7 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Emersonn the edge at 7.0 projected points. With ownership at 3.8% and 18.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Charalampos Kostoulas the clear short-term pick. Charalampos Kostoulas carries 10.0 expected points and 10.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Emersonn the clear short-term pick. Emersonn carries 7.0 expected points and 7.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Charalampos Kostoulas the clear short-term pick. Charalampos Kostoulas carries 10.0 expected points and 10.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|