FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 73.3% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £15.6m and £7.8m, there is a £7.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.1 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 73.3% and 8.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 6.6 expected points and 6.6 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 17. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.0m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.8 against Marc Guéhi at 4.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 18.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 14.3% for Semi Ajayi and 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £7.7m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 2.9 against Morgan Rogers at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 40% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.4 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 39.9% for Bruno Fernandes and 16% for Morgan Gibbs-White, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £7.0m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Gibbs-White generates more points per million this season. Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.3 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Gibbs-White the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 16% and 34.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominik Szoboszlai has averaged 3.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 18.6% for Marc Guéhi and 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £5.7m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4 against Pascal Groß at 5.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 20.1% and 21.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 6.4 for Gameweek 6, against 3.6 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 2.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 6.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 3.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 23.1% for Gabriel and 14.9% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £8.0m, there is a £3.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.2 against Gabriel at 3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 23.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Gabriel, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 17. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 2 goals and 3 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 21.5% for Pascal Groß and 14.7% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £4.6m and £6.5m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Virgil generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 2.4 against Virgil at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 3.4 projected points. With ownership at 19.4% and 16.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.9% for Lewis Hall and 16.4% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.6 expected points for Lewis Hall.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 4.0 expected points and 4.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.4 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Semi Ajayi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.3% for Semi Ajayi and 14.1% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|