

Priced at £11.7m and £8.2m, there is a £3.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Morgan Rogers at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 21.4% and 52.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 3.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 28. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Morgan Rogers has 5 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 52.7% for Morgan Rogers and 13.4% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Morgan Rogers.
|


Priced at £7.9m and £6.6m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Marcus Tavernier generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 5.7 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 35.2% and 28% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 3.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.5 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 12.4% for Semi Ajayi and 48% for Riccardo Calafiori, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.
|
Priced at £5.4m and £6.4m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 45.2% and 15% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 35.2% for Rayan Cherki and 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.
|


Priced at £7.9m and £6.7m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 5.7 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 35.2% and 13.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Bryan Mbeumo at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bryan Mbeumo has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 4 goals and 1 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 20.3% for Bryan Mbeumo and 28% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £5.3m, there is a £2.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against Lewis Hall at 7.9. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.6% and 19.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 6.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.4% for Bruno Fernandes and 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.
|


Priced at £6.7m and £7.9m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Bryan Mbeumo at 5.6. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 16.5% and 20.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Nicolas Jackson at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 4.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Nicolas Jackson has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard and 14.2% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.5 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £6.0m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against Marc Guéhi at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 2.2 projected points. With ownership at 12.4% and 15.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 1.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Francisco Evanilson leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Francisco Evanilson edges the combined goals and assists count with 8 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 18.5% for Francisco Evanilson, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.
|


Priced at £6.4m and £7.4m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Francisco Evanilson generates more points per million this season. Francisco Evanilson at 8.1 against Kai Havertz at 4.5. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Francisco Evanilson the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 18.5% and 5.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 3.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 5.7% for Kai Havertz and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.2 expected points for Charalampos Kostoulas.
|
Priced at £7.4m and £7.8m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 4.5 against Igor Thiago at 4.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 5.7% and 9.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW10. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.










