FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 10

Priced at £6.2m and £8.1m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.7 against Morgan Rogers at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 46.9% and 52.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Morgan Rogers has 5 goals and 1 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 52.3% for Morgan Rogers and 27.4% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.

|

Priced at £11.7m and £8.1m, there is a £3.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Morgan Rogers at 6.2. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 21.6% and 52.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 2.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 47.9% for Riccardo Calafiori and 18.9% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £5.4m and £6.2m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 44.9% and 18.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Virgil, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 46.9% for Pascal Groß and 14.3% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £6.2m and £6.7m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.7 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 3.2 projected points. With ownership at 46.9% and 13.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 20. On attacking output, Marcus Tavernier edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.6% for Bruno Fernandes and 27.4% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.

|

Priced at £9.2m and £7.0m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Nicolas Jackson generates more points per million this season. Alexander Isak at 5.8 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 21.6% and 25.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 4.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.5 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 2.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26% for Joško Gvardiol and 15.1% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.5 expected points for Virgil.

|

Priced at £6.4m and £9.2m, there is a £2.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Francisco Evanilson generates more points per million this season. Francisco Evanilson at 8.1 against Alexander Isak at 5.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Francisco Evanilson the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 17.8% and 21.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 22. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 4 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 20.5% for Bryan Mbeumo and 13.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £7.4m and £7.0m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Nicolas Jackson generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 4.5 against Nicolas Jackson at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 5.6% and 25.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 5.0 for Alexander Isak, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Igor Thiago has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Alexander Isak is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominic Calvert-Lewin leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Igor Thiago edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 20.9% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.

|

Priced at £6.4m and £7.8m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Francisco Evanilson generates more points per million this season. Francisco Evanilson at 8.1 against Igor Thiago at 4.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Francisco Evanilson the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 17.8% and 9.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.8 for Gameweek 10, against 4.2 for Charalampos Kostoulas, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Charalampos Kostoulas is averaging 4.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 5.6% for Kai Havertz and 9.9% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.5 expected points for Kai Havertz.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £7.4m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 7 against Kai Havertz at 4.5. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 7.6% and 5.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|