FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £5.8m and £5.7m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Joško Gvardiol at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 26.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 39.6% for Bruno Fernandes and 33.9% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.5m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 6.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 2.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 6.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.3% for Bryan Mbeumo and 33.9% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £5.8m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 4.4 against Pascal Groß at 8.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 27.9% and 25.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 9.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 3.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 9.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 22.9% for Gabriel and 26.2% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.4 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £4.9m and £8.0m, there is a £3.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 against Gabriel at 3.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 22.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 9.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 3.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 9.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 16.3% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.6 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £4.9m and £5.2m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 against Lewis Hall at 6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 15.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 3.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 22.9% for Gabriel and 15.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.2 expected points for Lewis Hall.

|

Priced at £4.6m and £6.5m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Virgil generates more points per million this season. Ezri Konsa at 2.6 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 19.4% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 6.0 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 22% for Alexander Isak and 9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £8.4m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Antoine Semenyo generates more points per million this season. Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5 against Antoine Semenyo at 3.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 15.8% and 14.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 6.2 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 2.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Semi Ajayi leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Semi Ajayi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Semi Ajayi and 16.3% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.4 expected points for Semi Ajayi.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £6.0m, there is a £0.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.7 against Gonzalo at 2.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 4.4 projected points. With ownership at 25.5% and 3.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.8 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 3.7% for Gonzalo and 8.5% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.8 expected points for Kai Havertz.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.0m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 4.2 against Gonzalo at 2.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 5.9% and 3.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|