FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 73.3% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £15.6m and £6.2m, there is a £9.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Yoane Wissa generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.1 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 73.3% and 19.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 4.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £7.7m and £7.0m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Morgan Rogers at 3.8 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 40% and 34.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 14.9% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £7.7m and £8.4m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Morgan Rogers at 3.8 against Antoine Semenyo at 1.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 40% and 14.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 28% for Rayan Cherki and 21.5% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £9.7m, there is a £4.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 5.8 against Cole Palmer at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 27% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 6.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 6.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Gibbs-White leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 16% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 21.5% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £8.0m, there is a £3.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.2 against Gabriel at 3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 23.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Gabriel, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 20.1% for Martin Ødegaard and 16% for Morgan Gibbs-White, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.4 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £6.5m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 4.3 against Virgil at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 18.6% and 16.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 3.6 for Lewis Hall, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Lewis Hall is averaging 3.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.9% for Thierno Barry and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £9.1m, there is a £3.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 1.2 against Alexander Isak at 2.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Alexander Isak the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 5.4% and 21.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Yoane Wissa at 3.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.4 for Gonzalo, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Yoane Wissa has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Kai Havertz and 8.9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.4 expected points for Kai Havertz.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £7.8m, there is a £2.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Igor Thiago generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 1.2 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 2.0 projected points. With ownership at 5.4% and 8.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gonzalo at 2.4 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gonzalo has averaged 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gonzalo leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Gonzalo edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.4% for Brian Brobbey and 3.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.4 expected points for Gonzalo.

|