FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £6.0m and £15.6m, there is a £9.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.3 against Erling Haaland at 2.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 25.7% and 73.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 2.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 3.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 39.9% for Bruno Fernandes and 40% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £15.6m, there is a £9.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2 against Erling Haaland at 2.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 3.7% and 73.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Gabriel, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 18.6% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £7.8m, there is a £4.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.4 against Rayan Cherki at 3.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 39.9% and 28% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.4 for Virgil, a gap of 2.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 21.5% for Bryan Mbeumo and 40% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £7.7m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4 against Morgan Rogers at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 20.1% and 40% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 22. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £6.2m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.3 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 25.7% and 19.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 6.4 for Gameweek 6, against 2.2 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 4.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 6.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 16% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 27% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Cole Palmer.

|

Priced at £9.7m and £8.4m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Cole Palmer generates more points per million this season. Cole Palmer at 2.9 against Antoine Semenyo at 1.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 27% and 14.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 5.4 for Gameweek 6, against 4.6 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 14.1% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.4 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £5.7m, there is a £2.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.3 against Pascal Groß at 5.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 16% and 21.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 5.4 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominic Calvert-Lewin leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.7% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 8.9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.0 expected points for Dominic Calvert-Lewin.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.0m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 1.2 against Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 5.4% and 25.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 2.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.4% for Brian Brobbey and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £7.6m and £7.8m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 2.2 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.4 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 8.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|