FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £6.0m and £15.6m, there is a £9.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.3 against Erling Haaland at 2.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 25.7% and 73.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 4.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.9% for Thierno Barry and 73.3% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 6.6 expected points and 6.6 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 5.4 for Gameweek 6, against 3.6 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 3.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 23.1% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.4 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £4.6m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 5.8 against Ezri Konsa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 25.9% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.4 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £4.9m and £6.0m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 6.5 against Marc Guéhi at 4.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 6.4 projected points. With ownership at 25.2% and 18.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Joško Gvardiol at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.4 for Virgil, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Joško Gvardiol has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol and 14.1% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £4.6m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 4.3 against Ezri Konsa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 18.6% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Semi Ajayi at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Gabriel, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Semi Ajayi has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 23.1% for Gabriel and 14.1% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £5.2m and £4.6m, there is a £0.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 3.5 against Ezri Konsa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 3.6 projected points. With ownership at 14.9% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Semi Ajayi at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 2.2 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Semi Ajayi has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.9% for Alexander Isak and 8.9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £6.5m, there is a £2.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.2 against Virgil at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 16.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Yoane Wissa leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Yoane Wissa edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 3.7% for Gonzalo and 19.3% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.0 expected points for Yoane Wissa.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Kai Havertz the clear short-term pick. Kai Havertz carries 3.4 expected points and 3.4 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 3.4 for Gameweek 6, against 2.4 for Gonzalo, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Thierno Barry edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 7.9% for Thierno Barry and 3.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.0m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Gonzalo generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 1.2 against Gonzalo at 2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gonzalo the edge at 2.4 projected points. With ownership at 5.4% and 3.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|