FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8% for Thierno Barry and 73.4% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 7.8 expected points and 7.8 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.8 for Gameweek 6, against 2.6 for Gonzalo, a gap of 5.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 22.9% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.5m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Semi Ajayi and 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £7.7m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 3 against Morgan Rogers at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 21.3% and 40.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 15.8% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 40.1% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £9.7m, there is a £3.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 8.1 against Cole Palmer at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 25.1% and 26.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Gabriel edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 22.9% for Gabriel and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £5.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against Lewis Hall at 6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 15.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 7.4 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 7.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 0. On attacking output, Gabriel edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 22.9% for Gabriel and 16.3% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £4.6m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 5 against Ezri Konsa at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 18.5% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Antoine Semenyo has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18.5% for Marc Guéhi and 14.9% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.6 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £5.2m and £6.5m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 6 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 6.2 projected points. With ownership at 15.7% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 3.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 22% for Alexander Isak and 9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Alexander Isak the clear short-term pick. Alexander Isak carries 6.6 expected points and 6.6 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Kai Havertz at 3.8 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kai Havertz has averaged 3.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 3.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Brian Brobbey.

|