FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 7.8 expected points and 7.8 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 40.1% for Morgan Rogers and 33.9% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £8.0m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Gabriel at 3.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 22.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 15.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.2 expected points for Lewis Hall.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £5.8m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Riccardo Calafiori at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 50.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 27.9% for Rayan Cherki and 25.1% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 9.4 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £7.0m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Gibbs-White generates more points per million this season. Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Gibbs-White the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 15.8% and 33.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 26.7% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £5.7m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 5 against Joško Gvardiol at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 18.5% and 26.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 6.8 for Gameweek 6, against 6.6 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 6.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Joško Gvardiol and 15.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.4 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £9.7m and £8.4m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Antoine Semenyo generates more points per million this season. Cole Palmer at 2.9 against Antoine Semenyo at 3.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.7% and 14.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.4 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 3.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Semi Ajayi leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Semi Ajayi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Semi Ajayi and 22.9% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.4 expected points for Semi Ajayi.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £8.4m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Antoine Semenyo generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 3 against Antoine Semenyo at 3.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 21.3% and 14.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Antoine Semenyo has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18.5% for Marc Guéhi and 15.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.2 expected points for Lewis Hall.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.0m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 4.2 against Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 5.9% and 25.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Brian Brobbey.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £7.6m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2.2 against Kai Havertz at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.8 projected points. With ownership at 3.7% and 8.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|