FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £5.6m and £15.6m, there is a £10.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 2.5 against Erling Haaland at 2.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 7.9% and 73.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Morgan Rogers, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Rogers is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 6.6 expected points and 6.6 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £15.6m, there is a £9.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2 against Erling Haaland at 2.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 3.7% and 73.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 14.3% for Semi Ajayi and 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £7.7m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.3 against Morgan Rogers at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 16% and 40% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 3.2 for Antoine Semenyo, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Antoine Semenyo is averaging 3.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 23.1% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.4 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £9.7m, there is a £2.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4 against Cole Palmer at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Cole Palmer the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 20.1% and 27% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Gabriel, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 20.1% for Martin Ødegaard and 21.5% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.4 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £4.9m and £6.5m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 6.5 against Virgil at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 6.4 projected points. With ownership at 25.2% and 16.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 25.9% for Joško Gvardiol and 14.9% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £4.9m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.2 against Maxim De Cuyper at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 6.4 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 25.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 2.2 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Gibbs-White leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 16% for Morgan Gibbs-White and 21.5% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Morgan Gibbs-White.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.1m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3 against James Tarkowski at 4.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 23.1% and 14.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Semi Ajayi at 5.2 for Gameweek 6, against 3.4 for Virgil, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Semi Ajayi has averaged 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.9% for Lewis Hall and 14.1% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £6.2m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Yoane Wissa generates more points per million this season. Igor Thiago at 1.3 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Yoane Wissa the edge at 3.0 projected points. With ownership at 8.9% and 19.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Alexander Isak the clear short-term pick. Alexander Isak carries 5.0 expected points and 5.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Brian Brobbey the clear short-term pick. Brian Brobbey carries 1.4 expected points and 1.4 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.0m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Gonzalo generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 1.2 against Gonzalo at 2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gonzalo the edge at 2.4 projected points. With ownership at 5.4% and 3.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|