Priced at £7.9m and £8.2m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 5.7 against Morgan Rogers at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Morgan Rogers the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 35.2% and 52.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 3.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Morgan Rogers edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 4 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 5 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 20.3% for Bryan Mbeumo and 52.6% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Morgan Rogers.
|


Priced at £5.9m and £8.0m, there is a £2.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 8.6 against Gabriel at 7.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 48% and 24.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 5.5 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 3.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 20. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 2 goals and 4 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 45.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 23.2% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 9.2 expected points for Ezri Konsa.
|
Priced at £11.7m and £6.2m, there is a £5.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 3 against Pascal Groß at 9.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 3.2 projected points. With ownership at 21.4% and 46.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.5 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for James Tarkowski, a gap of 2.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while James Tarkowski is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Marcus Tavernier leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 4 goals and 2 assists this season; Marcus Tavernier has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 35.2% for Rayan Cherki and 27.9% for Marcus Tavernier, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marcus Tavernier.
|


Priced at £6.2m and £6.7m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 9.7 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 3.2 projected points. With ownership at 46.9% and 13.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 25.8% for Joško Gvardiol and 19% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.
|
Priced at £5.3m and £6.2m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 7.9 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 19.8% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.2 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 6.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 4 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 16.5% for Martin Ødegaard and 20.3% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.
|
Priced at £7.0m and £6.0m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Nicolas Jackson generates more points per million this season. Nicolas Jackson at 6.1 against Yoane Wissa at 3.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Nicolas Jackson the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 26.3% and 9.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Kevin Schade at 1.5 for Gameweek 10, against 1.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Kevin Schade has averaged 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Virgil leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 15.9% for Marc Guéhi and 15% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.5 expected points for Virgil.
|


Priced at £6.7m and £6.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Kevin Schade generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 against Kevin Schade at 7.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 2.5 projected points. With ownership at 16.5% and 14.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.2 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 3.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Francisco Evanilson leads on total points and the gap stands at 32. On attacking output, Francisco Evanilson edges the combined goals and assists count with 8 direct contributions. Francisco Evanilson has 4 goals and 4 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18.4% for Francisco Evanilson and 9.7% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Francisco Evanilson.
|


Priced at £6.4m and £7.8m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Francisco Evanilson generates more points per million this season. Francisco Evanilson at 8.1 against Igor Thiago at 4.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Francisco Evanilson the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 18.4% and 9.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Thierno Barry leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Igor Thiago edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 7.7% for Thierno Barry and 9.2% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Igor Thiago.
|
Priced at £7.4m and £7.8m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 4.5 against Igor Thiago at 4.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 5.5 projected points. With ownership at 5.7% and 9.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW10. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.







