

Priced at £6.1m and £15.8m, there is a £9.7m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 6.1 against Erling Haaland at 4.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.2 projected points. With ownership at 20.9% and 79% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 3.2 for Gameweek 10, against 2.8 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 1 goals and 2 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 47.9% for Riccardo Calafiori and 26% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.5 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.
|


Priced at £5.4m and £6.2m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 12.8 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 44.9% and 18.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 3.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.5 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 1.7 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 3.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 1.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 38. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 9 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 6 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 46.9% for Pascal Groß and 13.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Pascal Groß.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £5.7m, there is a £2.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 7.3 against Joško Gvardiol at 7.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 8.2 projected points. With ownership at 24.4% and 26% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Ezri Konsa at 9.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 7.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Ezri Konsa has averaged 9.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 4 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 26% for Joško Gvardiol and 20% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 2.8 expected points for Lewis Hall.
|


Priced at £6.2m and £6.6m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Marcus Tavernier generates more points per million this season. Kevin Schade at 7.3 against Marcus Tavernier at 8.3. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Marcus Tavernier the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 14.3% and 27.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Gabriel at 8.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 6.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 8.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 19. On attacking output, Gabriel edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gabriel has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 24.4% for Gabriel and 15.1% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Gabriel.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £4.7m, there is a £1.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Ezri Konsa generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 6.2 against Ezri Konsa at 10.4. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Ezri Konsa the edge at 9.2 projected points. With ownership at 16% and 22.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Nicolas Jackson leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Nicolas Jackson edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Nicolas Jackson has 5 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 25.8% for Nicolas Jackson and 9.9% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 8.2 expected points for Nicolas Jackson.
|
Priced at £5.3m and £6.4m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Lewis Hall generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 7.9 against Virgil at 6.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Virgil the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 20% and 15.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 2.8 for Gameweek 10, against 2.2 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 21.6% for Alexander Isak and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.
|
Priced at £4.2m and £6.2m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 8.6 against James Tarkowski at 8.7. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 2.8 projected points. With ownership at 12.5% and 18.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Semi Ajayi at 2.2 for Gameweek 10, against 1.8 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Semi Ajayi has averaged 2.2 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 1.8 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 20. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 6 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 6 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.6% for Kai Havertz and 21.6% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.
|


Priced at £5.6m and £6.4m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Francisco Evanilson generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 7 against Francisco Evanilson at 8.1. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Francisco Evanilson the edge at 8.5 projected points. With ownership at 7.6% and 17.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Francisco Evanilson at 8.5 for Gameweek 10, against 3.5 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 5.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Francisco Evanilson has averaged 8.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last six gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Charalampos Kostoulas leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Charalampos Kostoulas edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Thierno Barry has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Charalampos Kostoulas has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 7.6% for Thierno Barry and 10.2% for Charalampos Kostoulas, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 10, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Thierno Barry.
|


Priced at £7.4m and £5.8m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Charalampos Kostoulas generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 4.5 against Charalampos Kostoulas at 7.8. The Gameweek 10 expected points model gives Charalampos Kostoulas the edge at 4.2 projected points. With ownership at 5.6% and 10.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW10. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.








