FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £15.6m and £9.1m, there is a £6.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Alexander Isak generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.5 against Alexander Isak at 3.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 73.4% and 22% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.8 for Gameweek 6, against 3.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 4.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 3.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 39.6% for Bruno Fernandes and 40.1% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £4.6m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Ezri Konsa at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 9.4 for Gameweek 6, against 6.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 3.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 9.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Cole Palmer leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26.7% for Cole Palmer and 33.9% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Cole Palmer.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £7.0m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 8.1 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 25.1% and 33.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 27.9% for Rayan Cherki and 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £4.6m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against Ezri Konsa at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.4 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 15.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.6 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £5.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against Lewis Hall at 6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 15.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Gabriel, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 21.3% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £8.4m, there is a £2.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 8.1 against Antoine Semenyo at 3.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 25.1% and 14.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 4.4 expected points and 4.4 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £5.2m and £6.1m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 6 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 15.7% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.8 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 2.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Semi Ajayi and 15.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.2 expected points for Lewis Hall.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £7.8m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Thierno Barry generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.6 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Thierno Barry the edge at 4.0 projected points. With ownership at 8% and 9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.8 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Brian Brobbey.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £5.7m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.6 against Brian Brobbey at 4.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 8% and 5.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|