FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £6.0m and £15.6m, there is a £9.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.7 against Erling Haaland at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 25.5% and 73.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 3.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 8. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 26.2% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.4 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £8.0m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Gabriel at 3.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 22.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 2.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Bryan Mbeumo leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 21.3% for Bryan Mbeumo and 33.9% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Bryan Mbeumo.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £8.4m, there is a £3.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Antoine Semenyo generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.5 against Antoine Semenyo at 3.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 39.6% and 14.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 22.9% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.6 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £5.8m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Pascal Groß at 8.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 25.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Cole Palmer, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Cole Palmer is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Gabriel edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 22.9% for Gabriel and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Gabriel.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £7.9m, there is a £1.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Bryan Mbeumo at 3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Martin Ødegaard the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 21.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 7.4 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 7.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Semi Ajayi and 26.2% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.4 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £4.6m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 5 against Ezri Konsa at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 18.5% and 19.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Antoine Semenyo leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Antoine Semenyo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 21.3% for Bryan Mbeumo and 14.8% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.

|

Priced at £6.1m and £6.5m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. James Tarkowski at 7 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 14.9% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Semi Ajayi at 5.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Semi Ajayi has averaged 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Kai Havertz and 22% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £5.2m, there is a £1.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Lewis Hall at 6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Lewis Hall the edge at 6.2 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 15.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 4.4 for Gameweek 6, against 2.6 for Gonzalo, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 4.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 19% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Brian Brobbey.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.0m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 4.2 against Gonzalo at 2.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 5.9% and 3.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|