FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £15.6m and £7.8m, there is a £7.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.5 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 73.4% and 9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.8 for Gameweek 6, against 3.8 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 4.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 26. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 3.7% for Gonzalo and 73.4% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £7.7m, there is a £0.1m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 4.4 against Morgan Rogers at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 6.8 projected points. With ownership at 27.9% and 40.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 6.8 for Gameweek 6, against 6.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 6.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Morgan Rogers leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists this season; Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 26.7% for Cole Palmer and 40.1% for Morgan Rogers, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Morgan Rogers.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £5.8m, there is a £6.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.5 against Pascal Groß at 8.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 39.6% and 25.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 22.9% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.6 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £8.4m and £7.0m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Antoine Semenyo generates more points per million this season. Antoine Semenyo at 3.9 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 14.8% and 33.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 27.9% for Rayan Cherki and 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £4.9m and £6.5m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Maxim De Cuyper the edge at 7.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Marc Guéhi at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Gabriel, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Marc Guéhi has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Bryan Mbeumo edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 21.3% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £4.9m and £6.1m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Maxim De Cuyper generates more points per million this season. Maxim De Cuyper at 7.8 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Gibbs-White at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Gibbs-White has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 18.5% for Marc Guéhi and 14.9% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.6 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.0m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 4.2 against Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 5.9% and 25.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Dominic Calvert-Lewin the clear short-term pick. Dominic Calvert-Lewin carries 4.4 expected points and 4.4 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 22% for Alexander Isak and 9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £5.2m and £6.1m, there is a £0.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Lewis Hall at 6 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 15.7% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has James Tarkowski at 8.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.4 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 3.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: James Tarkowski has averaged 8.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 8.5% for Kai Havertz, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Brian Brobbey.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £7.6m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2.2 against Kai Havertz at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.8 projected points. With ownership at 3.7% and 8.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|