FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 17. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.5% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 73.4% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £15.6m and £6.2m, there is a £9.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.5 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 73.4% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Erling Haaland at 7.8 for Gameweek 6, against 2.6 for Gonzalo, a gap of 5.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Erling Haaland has averaged 7.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 17. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.5m, there is a £0.7m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 14. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 14.9% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.6 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £5.8m, there is a £6.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.5 against Pascal Groß at 8.1. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 39.6% and 25.1% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Bruno Fernandes at 6.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.8 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bruno Fernandes has averaged 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 27. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.1% for Pascal Groß and 33.9% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 9.4 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £9.7m, there is a £3.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 8.1 against Cole Palmer at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 9.4 projected points. With ownership at 25.1% and 26.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Antoine Semenyo at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Antoine Semenyo has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Cole Palmer edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Cole Palmer has 2 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 26.7% for Cole Palmer, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £7.8m and £8.0m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Rayan Cherki generates more points per million this season. Rayan Cherki at 4.4 against Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Rayan Cherki the edge at 6.8 projected points. With ownership at 27.9% and 15.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 22% for Alexander Isak and 19% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £5.7m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Joško Gvardiol at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 26.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Antoine Semenyo leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Antoine Semenyo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 21.3% for Bryan Mbeumo and 14.8% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £6.2m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Yoane Wissa generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2.2 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Yoane Wissa the edge at 3.0 projected points. With ownership at 3.7% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Brian Brobbey at 4.8 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 2.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Brian Brobbey has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Igor Thiago the clear short-term pick. Igor Thiago carries 2.0 expected points and 2.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Kai Havertz the clear short-term pick. Kai Havertz carries 3.8 expected points and 3.8 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Thierno Barry the clear short-term pick. Thierno Barry carries 4.0 expected points and 4.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Brian Brobbey leads on total points and the gap stands at 11. On attacking output, Brian Brobbey edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.9% for Brian Brobbey and 3.7% for Gonzalo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.8 expected points for Brian Brobbey.

|