FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 17. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.2% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 73.5% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.8 expected points for Erling Haaland.

|

Priced at £15.6m and £6.2m, there is a £9.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.5 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.8 projected points. With ownership at 73.5% and 18.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 1.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 50.6% for Riccardo Calafiori and 16.3% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £5.8m, there is a £1.6m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Semi Ajayi generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Riccardo Calafiori at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Semi Ajayi the edge at 5.4 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 50.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.5 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 1.3 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 4.5 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Antoine Semenyo leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Antoine Semenyo edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Morgan Rogers has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Antoine Semenyo has 2 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 40.2% for Morgan Rogers and 15.1% for Antoine Semenyo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Antoine Semenyo.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £8.0m, there is a £4.0m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Gibbs-White generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.6 against Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 6.2 projected points. With ownership at 39% and 15.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 4.5 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 4.5 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 28.1% for Rayan Cherki and 15.8% for Morgan Gibbs-White, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.8 expected points for Rayan Cherki.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £9.7m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Gibbs-White generates more points per million this season. Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5 against Cole Palmer at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Gibbs-White the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 15.8% and 26.6% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 0.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 18.4% for Marc Guéhi and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marc Guéhi.

|

Priced at £6.8m and £8.0m, there is a £1.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Martin Ødegaard at 4.3 against Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Gibbs-White the edge at 5.6 projected points. With ownership at 19.9% and 15.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 6.0 for Marc Guéhi, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Marc Guéhi is averaging 6.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominic Calvert-Lewin leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Dominic Calvert-Lewin edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Dominic Calvert-Lewin has 2 goals and 1 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.2% for Dominic Calvert-Lewin and 9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 4.4 expected points for Dominic Calvert-Lewin.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £6.0m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.6 against Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 4.4 projected points. With ownership at 8.1% and 25.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.2 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Virgil, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Virgil is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 23. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 22.1% for Alexander Isak and 9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £7.6m and £6.2m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 2.5 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.2 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 18.8% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Yoane Wissa the clear short-term pick. Yoane Wissa carries 3.0 expected points and 3.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Kai Havertz leads on total points and the gap stands at 9. On attacking output, Kai Havertz edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Kai Havertz has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 8.5% for Kai Havertz and 9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.2 expected points for Kai Havertz.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Kai Havertz the clear short-term pick. Kai Havertz carries 3.2 expected points and 3.2 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Thierno Barry the clear short-term pick. Thierno Barry carries 4.0 expected points and 4.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Gonzalo the clear short-term pick. Gonzalo carries 2.8 expected points and 2.8 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|