FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Erling Haaland the clear short-term pick. Erling Haaland carries 7.8 expected points and 7.8 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 18.5% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.0 expected points for Marc Guéhi.

|

Priced at £5.8m and £6.1m, there is a £0.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 5 against James Tarkowski at 7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 8.6 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.4 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Pascal Groß leads on total points and the gap stands at 17. On attacking output, Pascal Groß edges the combined goals and assists count with 7 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Pascal Groß has 3 goals and 4 assists. Ownership sits at 39.6% for Bruno Fernandes and 25.1% for Pascal Groß, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 9.4 expected points for Pascal Groß.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £6.8m, there is a £5.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Martin Ødegaard generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.5 against Martin Ødegaard at 4.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 6.0 projected points. With ownership at 39.6% and 19.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 7.6 for Gameweek 6, against 7.4 for Joško Gvardiol, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 7.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Joško Gvardiol is averaging 7.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Joško Gvardiol leads on total points and the gap stands at 12. On attacking output, Joško Gvardiol edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Joško Gvardiol has 1 goals and 3 assists. Ownership sits at 22.9% for Gabriel and 26.2% for Joško Gvardiol, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.4 expected points for Joško Gvardiol.

|

Priced at £8.4m and £7.0m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Antoine Semenyo generates more points per million this season. Antoine Semenyo at 3.9 against Dominik Szoboszlai at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Antoine Semenyo the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 14.8% and 33.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Rayan Cherki at 6.8 for Gameweek 6, against 5.6 for Morgan Gibbs-White, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Rayan Cherki has averaged 6.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Morgan Gibbs-White is averaging 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 26.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 16.3% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.6 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £6.5m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against Virgil at 3.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 26.2% and 16.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 5.8 for Gameweek 6, against 4.8 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 1.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 5.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 18. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Alexander Isak has 4 goals and 0 assists this season; Yoane Wissa has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 22% for Alexander Isak and 19% for Yoane Wissa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.6 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Priced at £4.2m and £5.7m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Semi Ajayi at 6.4 against Joško Gvardiol at 6.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 7.4 projected points. With ownership at 14.2% and 26.2% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Semi Ajayi at 5.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.0 for Gabriel, a gap of 0.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Semi Ajayi has averaged 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gabriel is averaging 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Martin Ødegaard leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Morgan Gibbs-White edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Martin Ødegaard has 2 goals and 0 assists this season; Morgan Gibbs-White has 1 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 19.9% for Martin Ødegaard and 15.8% for Morgan Gibbs-White, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for Martin Ødegaard.

|

Priced at £5.6m and £6.0m, there is a £0.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Dominic Calvert-Lewin generates more points per million this season. Thierno Barry at 3.6 against Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 3.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Dominic Calvert-Lewin the edge at 4.4 projected points. With ownership at 8% and 25.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 3.8 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 2.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Lewis Hall leads on total points and the gap stands at 4. On attacking output, Lewis Hall edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 14.2% for Semi Ajayi and 15.7% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.2 expected points for Lewis Hall.

|

Priced at £7.6m and £6.2m, there is a £1.4m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Kai Havertz at 2.5 against Yoane Wissa at 2.4. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.8 projected points. With ownership at 8.5% and 19% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.8 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Igor Thiago the clear short-term pick. Igor Thiago carries 2.0 expected points and 2.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £7.6m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Brian Brobbey generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 4.2 against Kai Havertz at 2.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Brian Brobbey the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 5.9% and 8.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.6 for Gonzalo, a gap of 1.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Gonzalo is averaging 2.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|