Priced at £15.6m and £7.8m, there is a £7.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.5 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 7.5 projected points. With ownership at 74% and 9.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Morgan Rogers at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bruno Fernandes, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Morgan Rogers has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bruno Fernandes is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Erling Haaland leads on total points and the gap stands at 25. On attacking output, Erling Haaland edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Erling Haaland has 5 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 4.7% for Gonzalo and 74% for Erling Haaland, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 7.5 expected points for Erling Haaland.
|
Priced at £5.9m and £7.8m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 8 against Morgan Rogers at 3.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 15.5 projected points. With ownership at 31% and 41.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Lewis Hall at 6.5 for Gameweek 6, against 3.5 for Riccardo Calafiori, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Lewis Hall has averaged 6.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Riccardo Calafiori is averaging 3.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 1. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 18% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Marc Guéhi.
|
Priced at £5.9m and £4.0m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Riccardo Calafiori generates more points per million this season. Riccardo Calafiori at 4.9 against Issa Diop at 3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Riccardo Calafiori the edge at 3.5 projected points. With ownership at 50.7% and 12.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 15.5 for Gameweek 6, against 4.5 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 11.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 15.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 4.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Across the season, Bruno Fernandes leads on total points and the gap stands at 6. On attacking output, Bruno Fernandes edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Bruno Fernandes has 3 goals and 1 assists this season; Bryan Mbeumo has 2 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 38.3% for Bruno Fernandes and 20.4% for Bryan Mbeumo, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.0 expected points for Bruno Fernandes.
|


Priced at £8.0m and £7.8m, there is a £0.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Morgan Rogers generates more points per million this season. Morgan Gibbs-White at 3.5 against Morgan Rogers at 3.7. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Morgan Gibbs-White the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 15.7% and 41.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Bukayo Saka at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.5 for Dominik Szoboszlai, a gap of 2.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Bukayo Saka has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Dominik Szoboszlai is averaging 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Virgil has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 28.7% for Maxim De Cuyper and 16.2% for Virgil, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 8.5 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.
|


Priced at £5.7m and £6.2m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, James Tarkowski generates more points per million this season. Joško Gvardiol at 6.5 against James Tarkowski at 6.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives James Tarkowski the edge at 11.0 projected points. With ownership at 27% and 17.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 15.5 for Gameweek 6, against 12.0 for Kevin Schade, a gap of 3.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 15.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Kevin Schade is averaging 12.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Rayan Cherki leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Rayan Cherki edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Rayan Cherki has 3 goals and 2 assists this season; Bukayo Saka has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 28.5% for Rayan Cherki and 14.8% for Bukayo Saka, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Bukayo Saka.
|
Priced at £8.0m and £6.0m, there is a £2.0m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3.1 against Marc Guéhi at 5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 5.0 projected points. With ownership at 22.7% and 18% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|


The expected points model has Martin Ødegaard at 2.5 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Bryan Mbeumo, a gap of 0.5 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Martin Ødegaard has averaged 2.5 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Bryan Mbeumo is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Gabriel leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Issa Diop edges the combined goals and assists count with 0 direct contributions. Issa Diop has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 12.5% for Issa Diop and 22.7% for Gabriel, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Gabriel.
|
Priced at £7.9m and £6.2m, there is a £1.7m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Kevin Schade generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 3.2 against Kevin Schade at 6.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kevin Schade the edge at 12.0 projected points. With ownership at 20.4% and 12.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Igor Thiago at 3.0 for Gameweek 6, against 1.0 for Yoane Wissa, a gap of 2.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Igor Thiago has averaged 3.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Yoane Wissa is averaging 1.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|
Across the season, Kevin Schade leads on total points and the gap stands at 7. On attacking output, Kevin Schade edges the combined goals and assists count with 5 direct contributions. Bukayo Saka has 3 goals and 0 assists this season; Kevin Schade has 3 goals and 2 assists. Ownership sits at 14.8% for Bukayo Saka and 12.9% for Kevin Schade, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 12.0 expected points for Kevin Schade.
|
Priced at £6.0m and £7.8m, there is a £1.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Gonzalo generates more points per million this season. Gonzalo at 2.3 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Igor Thiago the edge at 3.0 projected points. With ownership at 4.7% and 9.3% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
The expected points model has Emersonn at 7.0 for Gameweek 6, against 4.0 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 3.0 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Emersonn has averaged 7.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 4.0 points per game over the last 5 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.
|


Sindre Walle Egeli has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Thierno Barry the clear short-term pick. Thierno Barry carries 4.0 expected points and 4.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.
|
Priced at £5.5m and £6.0m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Emersonn generates more points per million this season. Emersonn at 4.7 against Gonzalo at 2.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Emersonn the edge at 7.0 projected points. With ownership at 3.8% and 4.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.
|
25 random matchups from the top 10 most-owned defenders, midfielders and forwards for GW6. Ranked by combined ownership. Excludes goalkeepers and ruled-out players. Refreshes each visit.











