FPL Head-to-Head Picks for Gameweek 6

Priced at £15.6m and £7.8m, there is a £7.8m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Erling Haaland generates more points per million this season. Erling Haaland at 2.1 against Igor Thiago at 1.3. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Erling Haaland the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 73.3% and 8.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Riccardo Calafiori at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 2.2 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 3.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Riccardo Calafiori has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Riccardo Calafiori leads on total points and the gap stands at 10. On attacking output, Riccardo Calafiori edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Riccardo Calafiori has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Lewis Hall has 0 goals and 1 assists. Ownership sits at 50.7% for Riccardo Calafiori and 14.9% for Lewis Hall, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.6 expected points for Riccardo Calafiori.

|

Priced at £12.0m and £8.4m, there is a £3.6m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bruno Fernandes generates more points per million this season. Bruno Fernandes at 2.4 against Antoine Semenyo at 1.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bruno Fernandes the edge at 5.8 projected points. With ownership at 39.9% and 14.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Pascal Groß at 6.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Rayan Cherki, a gap of 1.4 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Pascal Groß has averaged 6.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Rayan Cherki is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Dominik Szoboszlai leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Antoine Semenyo edges the combined goals and assists count with 2 direct contributions. Antoine Semenyo has 0 goals and 2 assists this season; Dominik Szoboszlai has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.7% for Antoine Semenyo and 34.5% for Dominik Szoboszlai, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 3.6 expected points for Dominik Szoboszlai.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £5.7m, there is a £2.3m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Joško Gvardiol generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3 against Joško Gvardiol at 5.8. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Joško Gvardiol the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 23.1% and 25.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Cole Palmer at 5.6 for Gameweek 6, against 5.4 for Martin Ødegaard, a gap of 0.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Cole Palmer has averaged 5.6 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Martin Ødegaard is averaging 5.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Maxim De Cuyper leads on total points and the gap stands at 21. On attacking output, Maxim De Cuyper edges the combined goals and assists count with 4 direct contributions. Maxim De Cuyper has 1 goals and 3 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 25.2% for Maxim De Cuyper and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 6.4 expected points for Maxim De Cuyper.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £7.9m, there is a £2.2m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Pascal Groß generates more points per million this season. Pascal Groß at 5.8 against Bryan Mbeumo at 2.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Pascal Groß the edge at 6.6 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 21.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Gabriel at 4.8 for Gameweek 6, against 2.2 for Ezri Konsa, a gap of 2.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Gabriel has averaged 4.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Ezri Konsa is averaging 2.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Marc Guéhi leads on total points and the gap stands at 2. On attacking output, Marc Guéhi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Marc Guéhi has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 23.1% for Gabriel and 18.6% for Marc Guéhi, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Marc Guéhi.

|

Priced at £8.0m and £6.5m, there is a £1.5m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Gabriel generates more points per million this season. Gabriel at 3 against Virgil at 2.6. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Gabriel the edge at 4.8 projected points. With ownership at 23.1% and 16.4% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Maxim De Cuyper at 6.4 for Gameweek 6, against 5.2 for Semi Ajayi, a gap of 1.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Maxim De Cuyper has averaged 6.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Semi Ajayi is averaging 5.2 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, James Tarkowski leads on total points and the gap stands at 5. On attacking output, James Tarkowski edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Gabriel has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; James Tarkowski has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 23.1% for Gabriel and 14.1% for James Tarkowski, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.8 expected points for James Tarkowski.

|

Priced at £7.9m and £8.4m, there is a £0.5m differential between these two MIDs. On a pure value basis, Bryan Mbeumo generates more points per million this season. Bryan Mbeumo at 2.9 against Antoine Semenyo at 1.9. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Bryan Mbeumo the edge at 4.6 projected points. With ownership at 21.5% and 14.7% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Dominic Calvert-Lewin at 4.0 for Gameweek 6, against 3.4 for Kai Havertz, a gap of 0.6 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Dominic Calvert-Lewin has averaged 4.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Kai Havertz is averaging 3.4 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Semi Ajayi leads on total points and the gap stands at 15. On attacking output, Semi Ajayi edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Semi Ajayi has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Ezri Konsa has 0 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 14.3% for Semi Ajayi and 19.4% for Ezri Konsa, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.2 expected points for Semi Ajayi.

|

Priced at £6.0m and £5.2m, there is a £0.8m differential between these two DEFs. On a pure value basis, Marc Guéhi generates more points per million this season. Marc Guéhi at 4.3 against Lewis Hall at 3.5. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Marc Guéhi the edge at 5.2 projected points. With ownership at 18.6% and 14.9% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|

The expected points model has Alexander Isak at 5.0 for Gameweek 6, against 2.8 for Thierno Barry, a gap of 2.2 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Alexander Isak has averaged 5.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Thierno Barry is averaging 2.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Alexander Isak leads on total points and the gap stands at 13. On attacking output, Alexander Isak edges the combined goals and assists count with 3 direct contributions. Gonzalo has 1 goals and 0 assists this season; Alexander Isak has 3 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 3.7% for Gonzalo and 21.9% for Alexander Isak, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 5.0 expected points for Alexander Isak.

|

Jonah Kusi-Asare has a Blank Gameweek 6 with no fixture scheduled, making Yoane Wissa the clear short-term pick. Yoane Wissa carries 3.0 expected points and 3.0 recent form into this gameweek. The full head-to-head breakdown including form and fixture run is available on the comparison page.

|

The expected points model has Thierno Barry at 2.8 for Gameweek 6, against 2.0 for Igor Thiago, a gap of 0.8 points heading into this gameweek. Form supports that picture: Thierno Barry has averaged 2.8 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks, while Igor Thiago is averaging 2.0 points per game over the last 4 gameweeks. Both players are competing for budget space in millions of squads, and the decision often comes down to who carries better short-term momentum. The full fixture run and detailed head-to-head breakdown are available on the comparison page.

|

Across the season, Igor Thiago leads on total points and the gap stands at 3. On attacking output, Igor Thiago edges the combined goals and assists count with 1 direct contributions. Brian Brobbey has 0 goals and 0 assists this season; Igor Thiago has 1 goals and 0 assists. Ownership sits at 5.4% for Brian Brobbey and 8.9% for Igor Thiago, meaning this is a decision with real rank implications across a significant slice of the field. For Gameweek 6, the model projects 2.0 expected points for Igor Thiago.

|

Priced at £5.7m and £7.6m, there is a £1.9m differential between these two FWDs. On a pure value basis, Kai Havertz generates more points per million this season. Brian Brobbey at 1.2 against Kai Havertz at 2.2. The Gameweek 6 expected points model gives Kai Havertz the edge at 3.4 projected points. With ownership at 5.4% and 8.5% respectively, picking the right one has meaningful rank consequences. The full fixture-by-fixture comparison is on the dedicated head-to-head page.

|